The Role of the Parang Ilang in Iban Material Culture in Sarawak
Abstract
This study explores the parang Ilang through the lens of Iban civilisation and culture, highlighting its significance as a symbol of their historical grandeur and civilisational achievement in Sarawak. The parang Ilang is a traditional tool of logistics that plays a crucial role in Iban material culture in Sarawak. Beyond being a tool for defence and hunting, the Iban parang Ilang symbolises social status, heroism, strength, courage, and heritage passed down through generations. It also serves as a cultural identity marker, reflecting intellectual values and aspirations that are deeply rooted in everyday life. However, various factors have altered the cultural patterns of the Iban during the colonial era. Additionally, modernisation and globalisation have weakened contemporary Iban society’s ability to comprehend the origins and significance of the parang ilang within their material culture. In light of this, the present study aims to analyse the role of the parang Ilang within the Iban material culture, encompassing its use in warfare, traditional rituals, traditional healing practices, and as a legacy and heirloom. The research employs a qualitative ethnographic methodology grounded in fieldwork, utilising participant and non-participant observations as well as triangulated interviews with informants. Fleming’s theory (1974) is applied to data analysis. The findings reveal that the parang Ilang retains relevance and continues to be practised within contemporary Iban material culture. Ultimately, this study highlights the importance of appreciating the role of parang Ilang, thereby enabling younger generations to better recognise and understand the struggles and cultural heritage of their ancestors before the advent of modernity.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Fleming, E.M. (1974). Artifact study: A proposed model. Winterthur Portfolio, 9, 153–173.
Guerreiro, A. (2011). The Iban dairies of Monica Freeman 1949-1951. Including ethnographical drawings, sketches, paintings, photographs and letters, Lura P. Appell-Warren (Ed.). Philipps: Borneo Research Council, 11(17), 178–180.
Hafizzhal Bukhary Borhan, & Nur Aira Abd Rahim. (2024). Pengumpulan data di kalangan komuniti Orang Asli: Menelusuri Denai Jayapada. Internatonal Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 14(12).
Kader, T. (2003). Material cultural studies and art education: Connecting artefacts with making art. Art Education, 56(5), 19–23.
Heppel, M. (2014). The seductive warp thread: An evolutionary history of Ibanic weaving. Borneo Research Council, 45, 106–117.
Kamarul Azmi Jasmi, Azri & Ashrof. (2024). Metodologi kualitatif bagi pengkajian manuskrip perubatan Melayu. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development (JISED), 9(65), 320–331.
Keai, G. K., & Noria Tugang. (2020). Artifak budaya masyarakat Iban: Warisan dan pusaka. Jurnal Kinabalu, 26, 59–59. https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v26i1.2261
Keai, G. K. (2021). Inspirasi alam dalam artifak budaya masyarakat Iban di Sarawak: Jurnal Sains Insani, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol6no3.332
Keai, G. K., (2023). Faktor dan kemunduran artifak budaya dalam masyarakat Iban di Sarawak. Perspektif Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan. 15(1). 67–79. https://doi.org/10.37134/perspektif.vol15.1.6.2023
King, V. T. (2012). Culture and identity: Some Borneo comparisons. Institute of Asian Studies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
King, V. T. (2017). Borneo and beyond: Reflections on Borneo studies, anthropology and the social sciences. Dlm. Victor T. King, Zawawi Ibrahim, & Noor Hasharina Hassan (Eds.), Borneo studies in history, society and culture, hlm. 57–78. Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Institute of Asian Studies, & Springer Publications.
Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guideliness. The Lancet, 358, 483–488. htpp://dx.doi.org./10.1016/50140-6736(01)05627–6.
Moleong. (2006) . Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noria Tugang & Keai, G. K. (2022). The adaptation of nature in cultural artefact. Jurnal Borneo Arkhailogia (Warisan, Arkeologi & Sejarah), 7(1), https://doi.org/10.51200/jba.v7i1.4133
Pearce, S. (2017). Museums, objects, and collections: A cultural study. Smithsonian Institution.
Postil, John. (2017). The diachronic ethnography of Media: From social changing to actual social changes. Moment Journal. 4. 19–43. 10.17572/mj2017.1.1943.
Prown, J. D. (1982). Mind in matter: An introduction to material culture theory and method. Winterhur Portfolio, 17(1), 1–9.
Rockliffe, L., Stearns, S., & Forster, A.S. (2020). A qualitative exploration of using financial incentives to improve vaccination uptake via consent form return in female adolescents in London. PLoS ONE, 15(8), 0237805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237805
Faridah Sahari, Rahah Hasan, Lucas, T., Nur Farziana Angat, & Zahraa Farhana Hasbi. (2020). Material culture: A digital documentation of the art and culture of the Saribas Malay, Sarawak. Akademika, 90(2), 115–116.
Sellato, B. (2016). Recent material culture studies on Borneo. Moussons Recherche En Science Humanies Sur L’ asie Du Su-Est, 5(27), 163–172.
Sellato, B. (2017). Material cultural studies and ethnocultural identity. Dlm. Victor T. King, Zawawi Ibrahim, & Noor Hasharina Hassan (Eds.), Borneo studies in history, society and culture (hlm. 57–78). Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Institute of Asian Studies, & Springer Publications.
Sellato, B. (2019). The other tiger: History, beliefs, and rituals in Borneo. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (Yusof Ishak Institute)
