Unveiling Poverty in Interlock via the Key Words Semiotic Model

  • Raja Rajeswari Seetha Raman IPG Kampus Bahasa Melayu Kuala Lumpur

Abstract

Literature, as a form of social expression, conveys meanings and portrays the ideology of the author through diction and symbols either verbally or in written form. Symbols and keywords repeated and given special attention in literary texts convey an author's personal conceptualisation of particular concepts. The objective of this study is to explore Abdullah Hussain's views on poverty in his novel Interlock by using the Keywords Semiotic Model. This model is formulated by integrating the Semiotic Theory of Charles Sanders Peirce, a 19th century American philosopher with the Keywords and Conceptual Theory introduced in 2005 by Mohamad Mokhtar Hassan, a Malaysian scholar. The analysis and findings reveal that three different categories of poverty, i.e., physical poverty, emotional poverty, and internal poverty are discussed by Abdullah Hussain in his novel. Of these three categories, it is physical poverty and internal poverty that are accorded the greatest importance by the author and these dominates his conceptualisation from the perspective of the Keywords Semiotic Model. In other words, keywords and symbols are used as an instrument to highlight the various faces of poverty experienced by the novel's main characters who represent the three most populous races in Malaya: the Malays, the Chinese and the Indians. Extrinsic factors such as the author's background, past experiences, observations, readings, ideology, vision and aspiration influenced his conceptualisation of poverty.


Keywords: Interlock, poverty, conceptualisation, symbol, diction, keywords, Abdullah Hussain

References

Abdullah Hussain, 1996. Interlok. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Abdullah Hussain, 2010a. Interlock. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia.

Abdullah Hussain, 2010b. Proses Kreatif: Satu Pengalaman Rohani. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Collins English Dictionary, 1979. Glasgow: William Collins Sons & Co.Ltd.

Hayakawa, 1953. Symbol, Status and Personality. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Innis, Robert E. (ed.), 1985. Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Mohamad Mokhtar Hassan, 2006. Key Concepts in Usman Awang's Short Stories, Developing A Critical Tradition. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Mohammad Quayum & Rosli Talif, 1997. A Concise Dictionary of Literary Terms. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Paule D. Wiebe & S. Mariappen, 1978. Indian Malaysians: The View from the Plantation. New Delhi: Manohar Publications.

Sandhu, Kernial Singh, 1969. Indians in Malaya: Some Aspects of Their Immigration and Settlement (1786-1957). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shahnon Ahmad, 1994. Literature as a Seismograph of Life. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Solehah Ishak, 1998. Malaysian Literary Laureates Selected Works. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Wilfred, L. Guerin, 1999. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Williams, Raymond, 1983. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zeti Aktar Jaffar (ed.), 2008. Abdullah Hussain dalam Esei dan Kritikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Published
2019-03-08
How to Cite
SEETHA RAMAN, Raja Rajeswari. Unveiling Poverty in Interlock via the Key Words Semiotic Model. Malay Literature, [S.l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 248-266, mar. 2019. ISSN 2682-8030. Available at: <http://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/MalayLiterature/article/view/5333>. Date accessed: 05 feb. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.37052/ml.24(2)no5.