Article 233 Law of the Sea Convention 1982: An Analysis on the Straits of Malacca
(Fasal 233 Konvensyen Undang-Undang Laut Antarabangsa 1982: Satu Analisis terhadap Perairan Selat Melaka)
Abstract
The Straits of Malacca is a narrow strait located between three countries, namely Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. The Straits functions as the most important passage for hundreds of ships to deal with international affairs, particularly for trading purposes. Such a situation indirectly contributes to high traffic congestion and increases the risk of collision between ships, which consequently causes oil spills and damages the aquatic biosystems. Part III and Part XII of the Law of the Sea Convention 1982 (UNCLOS) would be applicable in addressing such issues, particularly Article 233. Article 233 would be the main discussion applied to analyse the extent of enforcement measures that could be taken towards ships that cause damage. Therefore, this article identifies the concept and definition of Article 233 and its application in curbing the issue of sea pollution in the Straits of Malacca. It aims to identify the measures that could be taken by the littoral states and the application of other provisions under UNCLOS 1982 in enforcing the laws in the Straits. This article also proposes suggestions and recommendations to improve on the issue of sea pollution and the obligations of the littoral states in curbing the problem.
Keywords: Article 233, The Straits of Malacca, sea pollution, Straits States, ships
References
Hanizah Idris. (2001). Isu kemalangan kapal dan pencemaran laut di Selat Melaka: Satu tinjauan. JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 6, 119-137.
Koh, T. (2007). Chairmans Introductory Remarks. Singapore Perspectives, 1-3. doi: 10.1142/9789812708243_0001
Koh, T. (2012). Straits used for international navigation: Some recent developments. The Regulation of International Shipping: International and Comparative Perspectives. doi: 10.1163/9789004202443_003
Lee, S & Bautista, L. (2018). Part XII of the United Nations Convention on the law of the sea and the duty to mitigate against climate change: Making out a claim, causation and related issues. Ecology Law Quarterly, 45, 129-156.
Mark, H. E. S., (2001). Changes on OSR system in major countries/ recent movement of compensation scheme: Natuna sea incident - Singapore's experience. PAJ Oil Spills Symposium 2001.
Nandan, S. N., & Anderson, D. H. (2001). Straits used for international navigation: A commentary on Part III of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. British Yearbook of International Law, 60(1), 159-204. doi: 10.1093/bybil/60.1.159
Persatuan Bangsa-bangsa Bersatu. (1982). Konvensyen Undang-Undang Laut Antarabangsa 1982.
Rothwell, D., G., O. E. A., Scott, K., & Stephens, T. (2017). The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford University Press.
R.Churchill, R. (n.d.). The LOSC regime for protection of the marine environment - fit for the twenty-first century? Research Handbook on International Marine Environmental Law, 3-30. doi: 10.4337/9781781004777.00008
R. Sativale. (2003). Transit passage in the Straits of Malacca. MIMA Bulletin, 11-2.
Rayfuse, R. (2011). Robin Warner, protecting the oceans beyond national jurisdiction: Strengthening the international law framework. Ocean Yearbook Online, 25(1), 487-489. doi: 10.1163/22116001-92500022
Rusli, H., Dremliuga, R., & Talaat, W. I. (2016). Legal framework on the marine environment protection of straits used for international navigation: Has it been effective in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore? Journal of East Asia and International Law, 9(1), 75-76. doi: 10.14330/jeail.2016.9.1.04
Rusli, M. H. B. M. (2012). The application of transit passage regime in straits used for international navigation: A study of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. Asian Politics & Policy, 4(4), 549-569. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-0787.2012.01374.x
Rusli, M. H. B. M. (2012). Navigational regimes through straits used for international navigation: A study of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. MIMA Bulletin, 19(1), 4-13.
Rusli, M. H. B. M. (2012). Navigational hazards in international maritime chokepoints: A study of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. Journal of International Studies, 8, 47-75.
Rusli, M. H. B. M. (2011). The application of compulsory pilotage in straits used for international navigation: A study of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. Asian Politics and Policy,3(4), 501-526. doi:10.1111/j.1943-0787.2011.01291.x
Rusli, M. H. B. M., Mustafa, M. B., & Wan Izatul Asma Wan Talaat. (2013). Replacing the transit passage regime with freedom of navigation in the Strait of Malacca: A case study with special reference to the Korea Strait. Ocean & Coastal Management, 78, 25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.03.00.
Scovazzi, T. (1995). Management regimes and responsibility for international straits. Marine Policy, 19(2), 137-152. doi: 10.1016/0308-597x(94)00007-f
The Corfu Channel Case (Merits) Judgment of April 9th, 1949. (1949). The Hague International Court of Justice.
Wardhana, Nanditya Darma. (2015). The Implications of the Implementations of Part III of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS 1982) 1982 to the Safety of Navigation and Marine Environmental Protection in the Straits used for International Navigation: The Review of Policy and Cooperation, and Future Direction of the Cooperative Mechanism in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore (unpublished Dissertations). World Maritime University, 501.
Yturriaga, J. A. D. (1992). Straits used for international navigation - A Spanish perspective. Verfassung in Recht Und Übersee, 25(1), 90-91. doi: 10.5771/0506-7286-1992-1-90.
