The Need of the Law of Innocent Passage in Malaysia

  • Wan Siti Adibah Wan Dahalan Fakulti Undang-undang, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nur Nabila Jaafar Fakulti Undang-undang, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

Abstract

Malaysia has ratified the 1982 United Nation Convention Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 and uses this convention as a guide to govern the country’s territorial sea. In 2012, the Territorial Sea Act was issued by the government as an initiative to implement UNCLOS 1982 domestically. However, Territorial Sea Act 2012 does not properly govern innocent passage in territorial waters. This Act is not sufficient to ensure that the governance of Malaysian innocent passage can be implemented domestically. The objective of this study is to observe the history and development of the concept of innocent passage in the territorial sea, to identify the provisions of the right of innocent passage in the territorial sea under the UNCLOS 1982 and to study the implementation of the innocent passage in the domestic laws of Malaysia and Australia and to suggest improvements that can be executed by Malaysia in strengthening domestic laws regarding innocent passage. The research methodology used in this study is qualitative through armchair method, comparative method and critical analysis method. The findings of this study is that Malaysia does not have a comprehensive domestic law for innocent passage while Australia has directly adapted the provision of UNCLOS 1982 related to innocent passage in the territorial sea into its domestic law. Suggested improvements that can be made is that Malaysia emulates Australia to adapt the provisions of UNCLOS 1982 directly into the Territorial Sea Act 2012, the drafting of a new act specifically for innocent passage, and reorganization of the set of domestic laws of the sea.


Keywords: Maritime, law of the sea, territorial sea, UNCLOS 1982, innocent passage, international law

References

Agyebeng, W. K. (2006). Theory in search of practice: The right of innocent passage in the territorial sea. Cornell International Law Journal, 39(2), 371-398.
Akta Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia 2004 [Akta 633]. Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-undang, Malaysia di Bawah Kuasa Akta Penyemakan Undang-undang 1968 dan Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Bhd. Laman Rasmi Maritim Malaysia. https://www.mmea.gov.my/artikel/Akta/Akta%20633.pdf
Akta Laut Wilayah 2012 [Akta 750]. Pencetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad. Jabatan Laut Malaysia. https://www.marine.gov.my/jlm/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/akta_laut_wilayah_2012.pdf
Beckmen, R. (2023). Prof Robert Beckman’s Reply to CIL Dialogues' Blog Post by Mohd Hazmi Mohd Rusli of 7 August 2023. Centre for International Law, National University of Singapore. https://cil.nus.edu.sg/blogs/prof-robert-beckmans-reply-to-cil-dialogues-blog-post-by-mohd-hazmi-mohd-rusli-of-7-august-2023/
Brock, J. R. (1980). Archipelago concept of limits of territorial seas. International Law Studies, 61(1), 328-364.
Burke, K. M., & DeLeo, D. A. (1982). Innocent passage and transit passage in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Yale Journal of World Public Order, 9, 389-408.
Crawford, E. (2012). Monism and dualism-An Australian perspective. Dlm. M. Novakovic (Ed.), Monism and dualism, University of Belgrade.
Dean, A. H. (1958). The Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: What was accomplished. American Journal of International Law, 52(4), 607-628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2195588
Florsheim, B. L. (1970). Territorial seas-3000 year old question. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 36(1), 73-104.
Gullett, W. (2013). Legislative implementation of the Law of the Sea Convention in Australia. University of Tasmania Law Review, 32(2), 184-207.
Kenny, J. T. (1977). Manley O. Hudson and the Harvard Research in International Law 1927-1940. The International Lawyer, 11, 319-329.
Kerajaan Sabah tolak Akta Laut Wilayah 2012 – Hajiji. (2023). Sinar Harian. https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/241579/edisi/sabah-sarawak/kerajaan-sabah-tolak-akta-laut-wilayah-2012---hajiji
Larson, D. L. (1992). National security aspects of the United States extension to the territorial sea to twelve nautical miles. Territorial Sea Journal, 2, 189–224.
Letters. (2022). Asia's busy straits must not become the playground of superpower navies. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/comment/letters/article/3178546/asias-busy-straits-must-not-become-playground-superpower-navies
Malhotra, A. (2020). Understanding innocent and transit passage. Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies. https://www.journalofterritorialandmaritimestudies.net/post/2020/06/05/understanding-innocent-and-transit-passage
Marr, S. (2003). The precautionary principle in the law of the sea: Modern decision making in international law (Vol. 39). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Mohd Hazmi Mohd Rusli. (2023). Prioritizing the marine environment: A possible Malaysian recharacterization of the Strait of Malacca to regulate the passage of nuclear-powered submarines. Centre for International Law (nus.edu.sg). https://cil.nus.edu.sg/blogs/prioritizing-the-marine-environment-a-possible-malaysian-recharacterization-of-the-strait-of-malacca-to-regulate-the-passage-of-nuclear-powered-submarines/
Nehaluddin Ahmad & Aqilah Walin Ali(2024). Protection of innocent and transit passage in maritime constraints and UNCLOS: An examination. Malayan Law Journal Articles, 2, xxiii.
Nemeth, S. C., Mitchell, S. M., Nyman, E. A., & Hensel, P. R. (2014). Ruling the sea: Managing maritime conflicts through UNCLOS and exclusive economic zones. International Interactions, 40(5), 711-736.
Nyegray, J. A. L. (2020). United Nations: Past, present, and future challenges. Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, 1-11.
Olenicoff, S. M. (1972). Territorial waters in the Arctic: the Soviet position, 8(5). The Rand Corporation.
Permanent Mission of Malaysia to the United Nations, New York. (2022). Statement by H. E. Syed Mohamad Hasrin Aidid, Permanent Representative of Malaysia to the United Nations on Agenda Item 72 (A): Oceans and the Law of the Sea Commemoration of the Fortieth Anniversary of the Adoption and Opening for Signature of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea at the Plenary of the 77th Session of the General Assembly, New York, 9 December 2022. https://www.kln.gov.my/web/usa_un-new-york/news-from-mission/-/blogs/statement-6-3
Ramcharan, B. G. (1977). The international law commission: Its approach to the codification and progressive development of interenational law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Smith, H. D. (2000). The industrialisation of the world ocean. Ocean & Coastal Management, 43(1), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(00)00028-4.
Sobel, R. S. (1994). The league of nations covenant and the united nations charter: An analysis of two international constitutions. Constitutional Political Economy, 5, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393146
Swarztrauber, S. A. (1970). The three-mile limit of territorial seas: A brief history [Tesis kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan]. American University.
UN General Assembly. (1982). United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. https://legal.un.org/diplomaticconferences/1958_los/docs/english/vol_4/a_conf13_c2_l106_150.pdf
United Nation. (t.t). History of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/history-of-the-un.
Varghese, R. (1985). Territorial sea and contiguous zone-concept and development. Cochin University Law Review, 9, 436–459.
Yano, J. (2019). The right of innocent passage – The
Maritime Review. https://maritimereview.ph/the-right-of-innocent-passage/
Published
2024-07-19
How to Cite
WAN DAHALAN, Wan Siti Adibah; JAAFAR, Nur Nabila. The Need of the Law of Innocent Passage in Malaysia. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, [S.l.], v. 36, n. 2, p. 243-262, july 2024. ISSN 2682-8057. Available at: <https://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/Kanun/article/view/8856>. Date accessed: 21 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.37052/kanun.36(2)no4.