Validity and Application of Practice Directions in Judicial Administration from the Perspective of Shariah and Civil Law: A Comparison
(Keabsahan dan Pemakaian Arahan Amalan dalam Pentadbiran Kehakiman dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Syariah dan Sivil: Suatu Perbandingan)
Abstract
Practice Directions have been introduced in the civil courts since 1946, and an adaptation of these was introduced in the Syariah courts in 2000. This article aims to explain the validity and position of the Practice Directions, as well as to compare these in terms of of legal provisions and application in the Syariah and civil courts. This research is a qualitative study involving library research (analysis of provisions of relevant laws and case reports), supplemented with interviews. It is found that Practice Directions were applied based on the provisions of the laws in force. However, there are differences in the position and application of Practice Directions between the Syariah courts and the civil courts in terms of source of authority, the authorities issuing the Practice Directions, enforcement and status, as well as the publication of Practice Directions. This study may serve as a guideline for JKSM and JKSN to re-evaluate and amend existing laws, or to form methods for Practice Directions for the courts to ensure that the ones used are valid and cannot be challenged by any party.
Keywords: Practice Directions, judicial administration, Syariah court, civil court, shariah law, civil law, practice direction methods
References
Akta Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Rendah 1955 [Akta 55]
Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 [Akta 91]Akta Prosedur Jenayah Syariah (Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan) 1997 Seksyen 230
Akta Tatacara Mal Mahkamah Syariah (Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan) 1998 Seksyen 245
Alek Amran bin Sutan Buyong & Seorang Lagi lwn Faridah bt. Johari [2010] JH 31(2) 129
Chua Choong Yin lwn Tan Boon Bak Trading Sdn Bhd & Anor [2002] 4 MLJ 145
Country Garden Danga Bay Sdn Bhd lwn Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Anor [2019] 1 LNS 1693
Curzon, LB. (1998). Dictionary of law. Kuala Lumpur: International Law Book Services.
Elizabeth A. Martin, ed. (1997). A Dictionary Of Law, Fourth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Elizabeth A.Martin & Jonathan Law (2006). Oxford Dictionary of Law, Sixth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Enakmen Pentadbiran Mahkamah Syariah (Kelantan)1982
Enakmen Tatacara Jenayah Syariah (Kelantan) 2002
Enakmen Tatacara Jenayah Syariah (Selangor) 2003
Enakmen Tatacara Mal Mahkamah Syariah (Kelantan) 2002
Enakmen Tatacara Mal Mahkamah Syariah (Selangor) 2003
Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Sabah) 1992
Faridah binti Ishak lwn Mohamad Amin bin Ahmad [2010] JH 31(2) 151-152
Hamiah binti Yaacob lwn Baitul Mal Majlis Agama Islam Perak [2014] JH 39(1) 109
Hamid Sultan bin Abu Backer (1985). Civil procedure in Malaysia and Singapore. Kuala Lumpur: Janab Sdn Bhd.
Wan Arfah Hamzah. (2009). A first look at The Malaysian legal system. Shah Alam: Malaysia Oxford Fajar.
Jayasankaran lwn PP [1983] 1MLJ 379
Kamus Dewan (Edisi Keempat) (2005). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan lwn Petroliam Nasional Berhad dan Kerajaan Malaysia [2011] 6 CLJ 649
Krisna Hadajani lwn Azian binti Omar [2013] JH 37(2) 235
Mazni Abdul Wahab (2014). Pemerkasaan mahkamah syariah melalui pemakaian arahan amalan Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia (Tesis Doktor Falsafah tidak diterbitkan). Jabatan Syariah dan Undang-Undang, Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya
Mazni Abdul Wahab (2016). Arahan amalan Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia di mahkamah syariah: Suatu sorotan literatur. Journal of Shariah Law Research (2016) vol. 1 (2)
Mazni Abdul Wahab, Ahmad Hidayat Buang Buang & Narizan Abdul Rahman (2012). Arahan amalan: Pelaksanaannya di mahkamah syariah di Malaysia.The Law Review. Sweet & Maxwell Asia.
Megat Najmuddin bin Dato Seri (Dr) Megat Khas lwn Bank Bumiputra (M) Bhd [2002] 1 MLJ 385
Mohd Amizi bin Che Seman lwn Suraya Hani binti Abdullah [2015] JH 41(1) 138
Mohd Khaizam Kamsan lwn Shahrina Sahabuddin [2017] JH 44(1) 70-71
Mohd Nadzri Haji Abdul Rahman (2010). Undang-Undang Tatacara Mal Mahkamah Syariah prinsip dan amalan. Kuala Lumpur: Anugerah Cekal Sdn. Bhd
Mohd. Radzali Masrum (2001). Maksim dan Ungkapan Undang-undang. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Muhammad Shariff Leong Abdulah lwn Noraidalena binti Mohd. Najib [2012] JH 34(1) 94
Norzihani binti Yusof lwn Imran Syakir bin Mohamad [2014] JH 38(1) 39
OCBC Bank (Malaysia) Bhd lwn Lim Hock Kok & Anor [2017] 9 CLJ 454
Ooi Bee Tat lwn Tan Ah Chim & Sons Sdn. Bhd [1995] 3 MLJ 465
Ordinan Tatacara Jenayah Syariah (Sarawak) 2001Ordinan Tatacara Mal Syariah (Sarawak) 2001
Ordinan Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Sarawak) 2001
Peraturan-Peraturan Pegawai Awam (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) 1993 Peraturan 4 & 38
Perlembagaan Persekutuan 1948 Jadual 9
Perlembagaan Persekutuan 1948 Perkara 121(1A)
Re Langton [1960] 1 WLR
Re Musa Awang [2014] JH 39(1) 224
Re Nor Farah Ain Shazlin binti Mohd Zamri [2017] JH 44(1) 136-139
Sheikh Ghazali Abdul Rahman (2005). Amalan-amalan pentadbiran di mahkamah syariah. Jurnal Hukum,20(2).
Suip @ Kanik bin Saniman @ Kadad lwn Salomah binti Saat [2014] JH 39(1) 29
Taib bin Omar lwn Shuib bin Omar & 8 Orang Lagi [2018] JH 46(1) 125)
Timothy John Smith lwn Norliza binti Ali [2014] JH 39(1) 73-74
Tun Abdul Hamid Mohamad. (2014). Penambahbaikan dalam pelaksanaan undang-undang harta pusaka Islam di Malaysia. Seminar Pentdbiran Harta Pusaka Islam Malaysia. Universiti Putra Malaysia: Institut Penyelidikan Produk Halal. Diakses daripada https://tunabdulhamid.me/2014/10/penambahbaikan-dalam-pelaksanaan-undang-undang-harta-pusaka-islam-di-malaysia/
Wan Arfah Hamzah (2009). A first look at the Malaysian legal system. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar.
Zainal Abidin bin Mohamed lwn Natasya Gabriel binti Abdullah [2018] JH 46(1) 143.
Zuraimi bin Mustapha lwn Mazliza binti Mat Amin [2013] JH 37(1) 129.