The Role and Challenges of the Court Mediation Centre in Resolving Disputes in Malaysia

  • Nurin Athirah Mohd Alam Shah Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia.
  • Muhammad Amrullah Drs Nasrul Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia.
  • Muhamad Helmi Md Said Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.


There has been an increase in awareness among Malaysians about settlement through the court. If there is a dispute that occurs in their daily life and it fails to be rightly resolved, the place they will go to is definitely the court. As a result, court cases are gradually increasing to the point where they have to be postponed or delayed to another date. When such things occur, it indirectly gives a bad or negative image to the judicial institution in Malaysia. Therefore, to prevent this matter from getting out of control, the court judge will suggest the parties involved to mediate at the Court Mediation Centre that is run by the High Court. Although this Centre has long been established in Malaysia, most Malaysians still do not know about its existence. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to inform the public about this Centre and to assess the role and challenges of this Centre in resolving disputes. This study used library research, that is, legal provisions, court cases, textbooks, journal articles, newspapers, conference proceedings and seminar papers. Structured interview was also conducted with court officers or appointed mediators. The findings from this study show that the Court Mediation Centre is actually effective in resolving disputes, especially family disputes. Therefore, the variety of efforts need to be intensified so that all the challenges in the Court Mediation Centre can be effectively overcome, in addition to increasing public awareness of the existence of the Centre.


1. Abdul Hamid Mohamad (2008). Officating Speech. [Persidangan] 4th Asia-Pacific Mediation Forum Conference, Kuala Lumpur.
2. Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964
3. Akta Mahkamah Rendah 1948
4. Akta Mediasi 2012
5. Alwi Abdul Wahab (2013) Court-annexed and judge-led mediation in civil cases: The Malaysian experience [Tesis PHD]. Victoria University.
6. Amir Mamat. (2020). 88 individu dihadapkan di mahkamah ingkar PKP. BH Online.
7. Aniza Damis. (2007). Go mediate! Mediation may be ordered to clear cases.Malaysian Bar. tion_may_be_ordered_to_clear_cases.html.
8. Asmidah Ahmad, Adzidah Yaakob & Kamilah Wati Mohd. (2015). Hak penyertaan kanak-kanak dalam prosiding sulh (mediasi) di mahkamah syariah. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 15(1), 1–14.
9. Asri Salleh. (2007). Dispute resolution through third party mediation: Malaysia and Indonesia. Intellectual Discourse, 15(2), 147–165.
10. Berita harian (2020). Sesi mediasi di mahkamah boleh guna skype, zoom. https:// mahkamah-boleh-guna-skype-zoom
11. Bernama. (2020). Mediation in court can be conducted online.
12. Cheak, D. (2019). Mediation: Process and mechanism.
13. Chow Jen-T’chiang (2010). Court-annexed mediation in resolving disputes relating to family in Malaysia: What we need to know before we go forward. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 2(1), 135–151.
14. Deepika Kinhal & Apoorva (2021). Mandatory mediation in India-resolving to resolve. Indian Public Policy Review 2020, 2(2), 49–69.
15. Drummond, R. (2005). Court-connected mediation in England: Foundations for an independent and enduring partnership.
16. Galhardo, A., Cunha, M., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Matos, M. (2013). The mediator role of emotion regulation processes on infertility-related stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 20, 497–507.
17. Gomez, J. (2011). Attributional styles, dating violence victimization, and depression: A mediation model. Poster presentation at the Institute of Violence, Abuse, and Trauma. International Conference, San Diego, California.
18. Hanna Ambaras Khan, Andriea Bastiampillai & Su Wai Mon. (2020). Mediation as a suitable dispute resolution method in medical negligence cases: Special reference to the Malaysian position. PERTANIKA Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(3), 2309–2323.
19. Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012.
20. Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah (Pindaan) 2020.
21. Lay Choo Lee. (2012). Overview of Malaysian Mediation Act 2012.
22. Love, L. P. (2012). Mediation of probate matters: Leaving a valuable legacy. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 1(2), 5.
23. Mnookin, R. H. (1998). Alternative dispute resolution. Harvard Law School.
24. Mohd. Husni Mohd. Noor (2023). JBG perlu tumpu khidmat mediasi untuk kes syariah – Azalina. Kosmo Online.
25. Muhammad Amrullah bin Drs Nasrul, Muhamad Helmi Md Said, Nora Abdul Hak & Wan Noraini Mohd Salim. (2019). Family Disputes in administration of estates: Analysis on mediation as effective dispute resolution mechanism in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 23(S1).
26. Nadia Murshida Abd Azzis & Alias Azhar (2018). Pendekatan mediasi dalam tuntutan hadanah: Kajian di Mahkamah Tinggi Syariah Pulau Pinang. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication,3(9), 36–45.
27. New Straits Times. (2007). Lawyers stumbling blocks to mediation.
28. Nora Abdul Hak (2007). Family mediation in Asia: A special reference to the law and practice in Malaysia. IIUM Law Journal, 15(1), 121–148.
29. Nora Abdul Hak (2008). Should compulsory mediation be introduced in Malaysia? [Persidangan] 4th Asia Pacific Mediation Forum Conference Kuala Lumpur.
30. Nora Abdul Hak, Ahmad Mukhlis Mansor & Roslina Che Soh. (2020). Resolution of child custody dispute: Legislative foundation and contemporary application of sulh in the shariah court of Malaysia. Journal of Islam in Asia, 17(3), 150–169.
31. Nur Khalidah Dahlan, Mohd. Rizal Palil, Mohamad Abdul Hamid & Noor Inayah Yaakub. (2017). Kaedah penyelesaian pertikaian alternatif dari sudut syariah di Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(1), 86–98
32. Nuzulsham Shamsuddin (2022). Jimat masa, wang jika selesai luar mahkamah. Kosmo Online.
33. Perlembagaan Persekutuan.
34. Radford, M. F. (2012). Advantages and disadvantages of mediation in probate, trust, and guardianship matters. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 1(2), 1–14.Ramah lawan Laton [1927] 6 FMSLR 128.
35. Rao. (2010). Courts will take 320 years to clear backlog cases: Justice Rao.
36. Sariha Mohd Ali & Petah Wazzan Iskandar. (2020). Hakim kanan mahkamah sesyen bantu kurang kes. BH Online. Wulan Sari (2017). Mediasi dalam peraturan mahkamah agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016. AHKAM, 5(1), 1-16
37. Shaila Koshy (2010). Opt for mediation, people told. The Star.
38. Sharifah Suhana Syed Ahmad & George, M. (2002). Dispute resolution process in Asia (Malaysia). IDE, Asian Law Series,17.Sophia Ismail (2021). Mediation in Malaysia-5 things you need to know. Richard Wee Chambers.
39. Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar. (2019). Mediasi sebagai alternatif litigasi. Sinar Harian Online.
How to Cite
MOHD ALAM SHAH, Nurin Athirah; DRS NASRUL, Muhammad Amrullah; MD SAID, Muhamad Helmi. The Role and Challenges of the Court Mediation Centre in Resolving Disputes in Malaysia. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, [S.l.], v. 36, n. 1, p. 107-120, dec. 2023. ISSN 2682-8057. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 24 june 2024. doi: