Forgery of Marriage Documents: Analysis of Related Provisions and Case Study under the Malaysian Shariah Courts
Abstract
Document falsification presents a significant challenge when presenting evidence in court. Various forms of document falsification exist, such as the falsification of marriage documents, false statements from witnesses, and forgery of signatures. This study focuses on the falsification of marriage documents. This focus is warranted due to the existing gap in the discussion of this offense within Malaysian Shariah courts, which necessitates a comprehensive study. The objectives of this study are to clarify the concept of document falsification and its position in Islamic law, analyze the legal provisions from the perspectives of fiqh and Shariah law, and conduct a case study on the falsification of marriage documents in Malaysian Shariah courts. To achieve these objectives, a qualitative approach was adopted, employing a document analysis method utilizing primary and secondary data. The data obtained is presented in the form of subthemes. This study is crucial in understanding the jurisdiction of the Shariah court when handling cases related to the forgery of marriage documents and in providing awareness to the Muslim community in Malaysia about the importance of preserving the authenticity of marriage documents for legal purposes. The findings of this study indicate that there is no specific provision for the offense of forgery in general; instead, it is prosecuted under the offense of contempt of court. For the offense of falsifying marriage documents, the offender can be sentenced under Section 38 of the Family Law Act. Based on the case study analysis, the fines imposed on offenders were found to be minimal. Therefore, the researcher suggests further research comparing the practices in Shariah courts with those in civil law in terms of handling cases of falsification of marriage documents and analyzing related legal provisions.. Keywords: Documents, evidence, forgery, marriage documents, legal provisions, Malaysian syariah vourt
References
Abdul Aziz Amir. (1976). Al-ta'zir fi al-shariat al-Islamiah. Dar al-Fikri Al-Arabi.
Akta Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah (Wilayah-wilayah Persekutuan) 1997 [Akta 561].
Akta Membaharui (Perkahwinan dan Perceraian)(Pindaan) [Akta 1976].
Akta Tatacara Mal Mahkamah Syariah (Wilayah-wilayah Persekutuan) 1998 [Akta 585], 1998.
Akta Undang-undang Keluarga Islam (Wilayah-wilayah Persekutuan) 1984 [Akta 303], 1984.
Al-Mausu'ah al-Fiqhiyyah. (1998). Wizarah al-awqaf wa al-syu'un al-Islamiyyah. Isdar Wizarah al-Auqaf wa al-Syu'un al-Islamiyyah.
Al-Mawardi. (1985). Al-ahkam al-Sultaniyyah wa al-wilayah al-diniyyah. Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
Al-Qur'anul Kareem & Terjemahannya Rasm Uthmani. (2012). Pustaka Darul Iman.
Al-Tabari. (2008). Al-ta'aqud ibra al-internet dirasah muqaranah. Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
Al-Zanibat Ghaziyy Al-Mubarak. (2005). Al-khibrah al-fanniyyah fii ithbat al-tazwiir fii al- mustanadat al-khatiyyah fannan wa qanunan. Dar al-Thaqafah.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Fischer, C. T. (2006). Research methods for psychologists: Introduction through Empirical Studies. Elsevier Inc.
Halijah Abdul Rahman lwn Zambree Baharom [2009] 1 CLJ (SYA) 402.
Hamidi Abdul Ghani. (2004). Ta'zir dan pelaksanaannya di Malaysia. Jurnal KIAS, 1(1), 28-50.
Ibn abbidin. (1995). Hasyiah radd al-mukhtar 'ala al-dur al-mukhtarn syarh tanwir al-Absar. Dar al-Fikr.
Ibn Kathir. (2003). Tafsir Ibnu Katsir Jilid 5. Pustaka Imam asy-Syafi’i.
Ibn Manzur. (t.t.). Lisan al-Arabi. Dar Ihya' Al-Turah Al-Arabi.
Jamilah Jamilah, Mega T Puspita, Endang Dimyati, Tetep Tetep, Prima Melati. (2019). People's unawareness of the importance of marriage certificate. Prosiding International Conference on Business, Law and Pedagogy (ICBLP) 2019. Sidoarjo, Indonesia.
Kamarul Azmi Jasmi. (2012). Metodologi pengumpulan data dalam penyelidikan kualitatif. Prosiding Konferen di Kursus Penyelidikan Kualitatif. Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia.
Kanun Keseksaan [Akta 547], 2021.
Khairul Anuar Abdul Hadi & Halil Paino. (2016). Legal perspectives towards forgery, fraud and falsification of documents: Recent development. Malaysian Accounting Review, 15(2), 93-109.
Kholed bin Dinyati lwn Melaka Chief Syarie Prosecutor (2009) 29 JH 2.
Leavy, L. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.
Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias, Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin & Lukman Abdul Mutalib. (2021a). An overview on the falsification of document according to fiqh and legal perspectives (238-247). Prosiding 8th International Conference on Management and Muamalah. Fakulti Pengurusan dan Muamalah, Kolej Universiti Islam Selangor.
Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias, Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin & Lukman Abdul Mutalib. (2021b). Systematic literature review on the concept of document falsification according to Islamic syariah law. Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Islam dan Sains (SAIS). Persatuan Kakitangan Akademik, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.
Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2022). The falsification of documents in marriage cases under the civil and syariah courts in Malaysia: An appraisal analysis [Disertasi sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.
Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2023a). Forensic science and its application in documentary evidence in Malaysian syariah courts. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 36(1), 107–120.
Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2023b). Pemalsuan dokumen dan kedudukannya dalam perundangan syariah di Malaysia. Journal of Management and Muamalah, 13(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.53840/jmm.v13i1.142
Mohamad Azhan Yahya, Ahmad Azam Mohd Shariff & Mohd Abu Hassan Abdullah. (2017). Keterangan dokumen dalam bentuk digital di mahkamah syariah: Analisis berkaitan definisi serta kebolehterimaannya di sisi prinsip syariah di Malaysia. UKM Journal Article Repository, 1, 1–12.
Mohamed Fauzi Mokhtar, Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail & Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin. (2020). Pembuktian melalui dokumen dalam kes-kes pengesahan hibah di mahkamah syariah di Malaysia. Prosiding International Seminar on Syariah and Law (INSLA). Fakulti Syariah dan Undang-Undang, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.
Mohd Zahiruddin Fahmi Ahmad Zakhi. (2015). Perkahwinan tidak mengikut prosedur: Kajian di mahkamah syariah Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur [Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Malaya.
Nur Sarah Tajul Urus & Alias Azhar. (2018). The application of fatwa in court decision making. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 3(9), 83–94.
Paizah Ismail. (2008). Kaedah pembuktian dalam kes hudud. Jurnal Fiqh, 5, 23–46. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol5no1.2
Pendakwa Syarie lwn Azlan Daniels bin Abdullah [2008] 2 SHLR 158.
Pendakwa Syarie lwn Badiuzzaman b. Abdul Rajak (No. Kes Jenayah Syariah: 14003-149-0015-2010).
Samir Burhan Mahmoud Hasan. (2010). Ahkam jara’im al-tazwir fi fiqh al-Islami. Universiti al-Najah.
Skuad Khas Harian Metro. (2021, 30 Mac). Pemalsuan dokumen untuk berpoligami adalah kesalahan jenayah. Harian Metro. https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2021/-03/689587/pemalsuan-dokumen-untuk-berpoligami-adalah-kesalahan-jenayah.
Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ruzian Markom & Mohd. Munzil Muhamad. (2019). Kaedah pembuktian dalam undang-undang keterangan mahkamah syariah dan mahkamah sivil di Malaysia: Suatu kajian perbandingan. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia, 31(1), 1–34.
Wahbah Al-Zuhaily. (1994). Wasa'il al-ithbat fi al-syari'ah al-Islamiyyah wa al-mu'amalat al-madaniyyah wa al-ahwal al-syakhsiyyah. Maktabah al-Mu;ayyad.
Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Lukman Abdul Mutalib & Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2021a). An appraisal of digital documents as evidence in Islamic law. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0076
Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Lukman Abdul Mutalib & Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2021b). A systematic analysis on the admissibility of digital documents as evidence in Malaysian syariah courts. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 29(3), 1981–1996.
Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Lukman Abdul Mutalib & Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2020). The admissibility of digital document according to syariah law: A preliminary analysis. Prosiding International Seminar on Syariah and Law (INSLA). Fakulti Syariah dan Undang-undang, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.
Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail. (2020). Keterangan dokumentar menurut fiqh dan undang-undang keterangan Islam di Malaysia. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
