Retrospective Effect in Islamic Criminal Law and the Federal Constitution: A Comparative Analysis
(Kesan Retrospektif Undang-Undang Jenayah Menurut Perundangan Islam dan Perlembagaan Persekutuan: Satu Analisis Perbandingan)
Abstract
This article comparatively analyzes the retrospective application of criminal laws between Islamic law and the Federal Constitution. Islamic law has placed two important exceptions to the retrospective application of criminal law. Firstly, if the crime is so dangerous and capable of posing a threat to public peace and the stability of the country, and secondly, if the law is in favour of the offender. This includes circumstances where a new law provides for a lighter punishment or decriminalizes the act. If the new law provides for a greater punishment then it cannot be applied retrospectively since it disfavours the offender. On the other hand, Article 7(1) of the Constitution clearly provides for only two circumstances in which criminal laws cannot be enforced with retrospective effect i.e. if the act was not a crime under the existing law at the time it was committed, and if a new law provides for a greater punishment.
Keywords: ex post facto, Federal Constitution, crime cases, comparative analysis
References
Abdul Rahman al-Suyuti, 1983. Al-Ashbah wa al-Nazhoir fi Qawa'id wa Furu' Fiqh al-Shafi'iah. Beirut:Dar al-Kutub.
Abdul Qadir Audah, 1998. Al-Tasyri` al-Jana`ie al-Islami-Muqaranan bi al-Qanuni al-Wad`ie. Muassasah al-Risalah, Beirut,
Abu A'id, Al-A'bdu Khalil, 1983. Mabahith fi Usul al-Fiqh al-Islami. Amman: Dar al-Furqan.
Abdul Qadir Audah, 2008. Al-tashri' Al-Jina'I Al-Islami. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah al-Nasirun.
Al-Quran Al-Karim (mushaf Al-Madinah An-Nabawiyyah), t.t. Majma' Al-Malik Fahad. Arab Saudi.
Al-Qurtubi, Muhammad bin Ahmad, 1986. Al-Jami' li Ahkamil Quran. Beirut:Darul Fikr.
Al-Zarqa`, Ahmad Muhammad, 1998. Sharh al-Qawa`id al-Fiqhiyyah. Damsyiq, Dar al-Qalam.
Anwarullah, 2002. The Criminal Law of Islam. A.S. Noordeen, Kuala Lumpur,
Chua Han Mow lwn Superintendent Penjara Pudu [1979] 2 MLJ 70.
Enakmen Kesalahan Jenayah Syariah (Hudud & Qisas) Terengganu 1423/2002M.
Gerald Fernandez lwn Attorney-General, Malaysia[1970] 1 MLJ 262.
http: //www.ag.gov.au/RightsAndProtections/HumanRights/PublicSectorGuidanceSheets/
Pages/Absoluterights.aspx
http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/legal/general_news/suhakam_given_memo_on_
45_isa_detainees.html
Ibrahim bin Musa al-Shatibi, 2005. Al-Muwafaqat. Kaherah: Dar al-Hadith.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, , dlm. http://swiged76.hcrnet.ch/refworld/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html.
Kamus Dewan dlm. http://prpm.dbp.gov.my/Search.aspx?k=kesan[Capaian 22 Februari 2012].
Liyanage lwn The Queen [1967] 1 AC 259.
Looh Kooi Choon lwn Kerajaan Malaysia [1977] 2 MLJ 187.
Muhammad bin Ahmad Al-Qurtubi, 1986. Al-Jami' Li Ahkamil Quran. Beirut:Darul Fikr.
Perlembagaan Persekutuan.
Shamrahayu A. Aziz, "Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege: Non-Retrospective Application of Law Under the Malaysian Federal Constitution" dlm. The IIUM Law Review hlm.554-64, 2008.
Yusuf Abu Hamidah, 2009. Al-athar Al-Rajie wa Tatbiqatuhu fi al-Ahkam al-Syari'yyah. Jordan: Darul Nafai.
