Legal Protection for Victims of Medical Practitioner Misconduct in Indonesia and Malaysia

(Perlindungan Undang-Undang terhadap Mangsa Salah Laku Pengamal Perubatan di Indonesia dan Malaysia)

  • Asmah Laili Haji Yeon Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Roswita Sitompul Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Abstract

Nowadays, it is a norm for patients to claim for medical negligence. Negligence includes the offence of giving a wrong diagnosis, mistreatment and failure to do treatment which resulting in patients getting disability or death. The objectives of the article are to discuss the efforts made to prevent the occurrence of medical misconduct, and the law that protects victims of medical misconduct. This article is based on qualitative research and using a comparative socio-legal method. The research uses a variety of data collection methods i.e. library search, documentation review, observation, interviews and questionnaires. Data were analyzed by content analysis and t-test. The result shows there are five parameters that have the sig <0.05 significant legal protection for victims of wrongdoing which is better in Malaysia rather than in Indonesia. In Indonesia, negligence is specified in the Penal Code, Sections 359 and 360, and the Law Number 29, Section 1365 and 1239, while in Malaysia are stated in the law of tort. Legal protections for victims of wrongdoings in Indonesia are still not effective even though there is a law Number 29 of 2004 because it was not in favour of the patients, but it is more favourable to medical practitioner.


Keywords: comparison, law, Indonesia, Malaysia, misconduct, medical practitioners, negligence

Author Biography

Asmah Laili Haji Yeon, Universiti Utara Malaysia

Kolej Undang-undang, Kerajaan dan Pengajian Antarabangsa

References

Akta Perubatan 1971 (Akta 50).

Abdul Djamali dan Lenawati Tedjapermana,1988. Tanggung Jawab Seorang Pengamal Perubatan dalam Menangani Pesakit. Jakarta: Aberalin.

Ahmad Azam bin Mohd Shariff, 2011. Pengaplikasian Kaedah Pengantaraan bagi Menyelesaikan Pertikaian Kecuaian Perubatan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Charles M Tampubolon. "Kesalahan Pengamal perubatan Tergolong Malpraktek," www.undang-undang.Online.Com Maret 27, 2009)

C.R.A.Martin, 1979. Law Relating to Medical Practice. London: Pitman Medical Publishing Co.Ltd.

Foo Fio Na lwn Dr. Soo Fook Mun & Anor [2007] 1 CLJ 229.

H.M. Soedjatmiko, 2001. Masalah Medik dalam Malpraktik Yuridis. Malang: Rumah Sakit Umum Dr Saiful Anwar.

Muladi, 1990. "Proyeksi Undang-undang Jenayah Materil Indonesia di Masa Datang". Pidato Guru Besar Universitas Diponegoro. Jakarta: UNDIP

R lwn General Medical Council (1930) 1 KB 562 CA.

Romli, Atmasasmita, 1996. Perbandingan Undang-undang Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Suharsimi Arikunto, 2002. Prosedur Penelitian. Yokyakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Undang-undang Nombor 29 Tahun 2004.

W.B. van der Mijn, 1988. Vrouwen en gezondheidszorg. (S.l.), (s.n.).
Published
2020-04-23
How to Cite
HAJI YEON, Asmah Laili; SITOMPUL, Roswita. Legal Protection for Victims of Medical Practitioner Misconduct in Indonesia and Malaysia. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, [S.l.], v. 26, n. 1, p. 88-102, apr. 2020. ISSN 2682-8057. Available at: <https://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/Kanun/article/view/7974>. Date accessed: 29 mar. 2024.