The Jurisdiction of the Civil Courts in Cases of Forged Marriage Documents: A Legal Analysis and Case Study)
Abstract
Document forgery constitutes one of the challenges in establishing documentary evidence before the Malaysian Civil Courts, particularly when it involves marriage certificates, registration records, and supporting documents that form the basis for the legal recognition of a marriage. Forgery of documents in the context of marriage gives rise to significant legal implications, including the determination of marital validity, divorce proceedings, inheritance claims, and the legal rights of the parties involved. Within the civil legal framework, such offences are regulated primarily under the Penal Code [Act 574] and the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 [Act 164]. This study analyses the jurisdiction of the civil courts in addressing cases involving the forgery of marriage documents by examining the relevant statutory provisions, analysing several key judicial decisions that shape current practice, and proposing legal reforms to strengthen the role of the civil courts in addressing marriage document forgery in Malaysia. This study adopts a qualitative research design through document analysis of primary and secondary legal sources. The data obtained are subsequently presented in the form of subthemes. The findings indicate that the civil courts have institutionalised strict and consistent evidentiary procedures in assessing the authenticity of marriage documents, including through signature comparison, the use of expert evidence, and the application of Section 73 of the Evidence Act 1950 [Act 56]. In addition, provisions such as Section 42 of Act 164 prescribe clear punitive sanctions for offences relating to the forgery of marriage documents and reflect a legal commitment to preventing the misuse of official documents. The principal contribution of this study lies in clarifying the jurisdiction of the civil courts and evaluating the effectiveness of statutory provisions and evidentiary principles in addressing the forgery of marriage documents. The study further highlights the need for legal and administrative reforms, including improvements to document verification mechanisms and the adoption of digital security features to enhance the integrity of marriage registration in Malaysia.
Keywords: Document forgery, evidence, evidence, marriage certificates, civil courts, jurisdiction, legal reform
Full text: PDF
References
2. Ani Munirah Mohamad. (2019). Admissibility and authenticity of electronic evidence in the courts of Malaysia and United Kingdom. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 4(15), 121–129.
3. Anwarullah. (2010). Principles of evidence in Islam. A. S. Noordeen.
4. Garner, B. A. (2004). Black’s law dictionary (ed. ke-8). Thomson West.
5. Habibah Omar, & Mazlina Mahali. (2020). Law of evidence in Malaysia. Sweet & Maxwell.
6. Hyde lwn. Hyde and Woodmansee (1866) LR 1 P&D 130.
7. Jamilah Jamilah, Mega T. Puspita, Endang Dimyati, Tetep Tetep, & Prima Melati. (2019). People’s unawareness of the importance of marriage certificate. Dlm. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law and Pedagogy, ICBLP 2019 (hlm. 1–5). Sidoarjo, Indonesia.
8. Khaila Humaira R., M. Zaki Rizaldi, & Asmak Ul Hosnah. (2024). Analisis yuridis terhadap tindak pidana pemalsuan dokumen. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(1), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i1.461
9. Khairul Anuar Abdul Hadi, & Halil Paino. (2016). Legal perspectives towards forgery, fraud and falsification of documents: Recent development. Malaysian Accounting Review, 15(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.24191/mar.v15i2.589
10. Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias, Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, & Muzaffar Syah Mallow. (2024). Wasa’il ithbat dalam undang-undang keterangan Islam: Analisis perundangan terhadap kebolehterimaan dokumen elektronik di Mahkamah Syariah Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.792
11. Mohamad Azhan Yahya, Ahmad Azam Mohd Shariff, & Nurul Nisa Khalid. (2024). Proses pengumpulan keterangan dokumen elektronik. Penerbit UKM.
12. Mohammad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2022). The falsification of documents in marriage cases under the civil and syariah courts in Malaysia: An appraisal analysis [Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.
13. Mohammad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2023). Pemalsuan dokumen dan kedudukannya dalam perundangan syariah di Malaysia. Journal of Management and Muamalah, 13(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.53840/jmm.v13i1.142
14. Mohammad Aniq Aiman Alias. (2024a). Pemalsuan dokumen perkahwinan: Analisis terharap oeruntukan berkaitan dan kajian kes di mahkamah syariah Malaysia. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 36(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.37052/kanun.36(2)no1
15. Mohammad Khairil Ashraf Mohd Khalid. (2024, 15 Disember). Anak bakal berdepan masalah identiti. MyMetro. https://www.hmetro.com.my/utama/
2024/12/1166270/anak-bakal-berdepan-masalah-identiti
16. Mohd Zahiruddin Fahmi Ahmad Zakhi. (2015). Perkahwinan tidak mengikut prosedur: Kajian di Mahkamah Syariah Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur [Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Malaya.
17. Muhammad Hazim Ahmad, Mohamad Anwar Zakaria, Noraishah Nordin, Siti Khadijah Ishak, Nur Khairina Othaman, & Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin. (2019). Analisis perundangan bagi undang-undang keterangan mahkamah syariah berkaitan bukti saintifik dan penerimaannya di mahkamah syariah. Dlm. Haliza A. Shukor, Zahari Mahad Musa, Syaryanti Hussin, & Norman Zakiyy Chow Jen T-Chiang (Pnyt.), E-Proceeding Diskusi Syariah dan Undang-undang (Siri 1, hlm. 40–55). Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. https://www.scribd.com/document/709492135/DSU-Prosiding-Siri-1-2019
18. Nuraisyah Chua Abdullah. (2020). Family law for non-Muslims in Malaysia. International Law Books Services (ILBS).
19. Nurul Izzati Koldun, Nur Aina Zafirah Azmi, Intan Shafinaz Mohammadi, Suhaizad Saifuddin, & Lukman Abdul Mutalib. (2024). Pemakaian keterangan dokumen elektronik dalam pembuktian: Kajian kes di mahkamah syariah Malaysia. Dlm. Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Lukman Abdul Mutalib, Zulfaqar Mamat, Aspalilah Alias, Hasnizam, Hashim, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Muhammad Aniq Aiman Alias, Tuan Mohd Faris Hamzi Tuan Ibrahim, Radin Ahmad Taufik Salikin Izzaddin & Ahmad Salman Mohd Yusof (Pnyt.), Proceedings of 2nd CFORSJ International Conference on Syariah, Law, and Science 2024 (Jld. 2, No. 1, hlm. 571–582). Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. https://alnadwah.usim.edu.my/cforsjprocedia/paper/view/4
20. Pathmanabhan Nallusamy lwn. Pendakwa Raya [2013] MLJU 1567.
21. Paul, A. (2010). Evidence: Practice and procedure. LexisNexis Malaysia.
22. Pendakwa Raya lwn. Chin Kim [1985] 2 MLJ 129.
23. Pendakwa Raya lwn. Datuk Haji Sahar Arpan [2007] 1 AMR.
24. Pendakwa Raya lwn. Lee Weng Tuck [2010] 7 MLJ 414.
25. Pendakwa Raya lwn. Pasupathy A/L Kanagasaby [1995] MLJU 541.
26. R lwn. Maqsud Ali [1966] 1 QB 688.
27. Rantanlal, & Dhirajlal. (2007). Law of crimes. Puliani for Bharat Law House.
28. Re Estate of Chong Swee Lin; Kam Soh Keh lwn. Chan Kok Leong & Ors [1997] 4 MLJ 375.
29. Shuhairimi Abdullah, Noor Salwani Hussin, & Abdul Jalil Ramli. (2021). Impak perkahwinan tanpa kebenaran memberi kesan kepada pasangan dan institusi kekeluargaan. Dlm. Sumit Kundu, U. Shripathi Acharya, Chanchal Kr. De & Surajit Mukherjee (Pnyt.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Communication in Scientific Inquiry (CSI) 2021 (hlm. 1–18). Universiti Malaysia Perlis.
30. Suzana Muhamad Said, & Raja Muhammad Zuha Raja Kamal Bashah. (2018). Exploring the legal aspects and court process of forensics entomology from the Malaysia’s perspective. Serangga, 23(2), 268–278.
31. Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Lukman Abdul Mutalib, & Nurul Syahirah Saharudin. (2019). Understanding of syariah practitioners in Malaysia on document forgery. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviws. 7(6), 349–355.
32. Yeoh lwn. Chew [2001] 4 MLJ 373.
