Persoalan keunggulan univositi: perbezaan antara terminologi sosiokognitif dengan terminologi tradisional

  • Rita Temmerman

Abstrak

Dalam makalah ini, penulis mempersoalkan keunggulan univositi Terminologi tradisional. Penulis akan memperlihatkan bagaimana Terminologi tradisional yang selari dengan pendekatan strukturalisme Saussurian tidak mengambil kira bahagian-bahagian sating mempengaruhi antara unsur dalam segi tiga semantik. Semantik kognitif dan linguistik fungsional telah memberikan alternatif kepada pendekatan strukturalis Saussurian. Dalam Bahasa untuk Tujuan Khusus (BTK) bidang sains hayat, struktur konsep mencerminkan fungsi epistemologi. Hal ini akan memberikan kesan terhadap penghuraian kaedah terminologi. Beberapa konsep seperti intron jelas difahami dan boleh diterapkan prinsip univositi tetapi konsep-konsep lain seperti pemblotan dan bioteknologi mempunyai struktur prototaip. Bagi yang berstruktur prototaip ini, univositi bukanlah tujuan utamanya kerana polisemi, sinonim dan bahasa figuratif merupakan sebahagian daripada sejarah penamaan.

Rujukan

1. Bains,W.,1993. Biotechnology from A to Z. Oxford University Press.

2. Berg, P. Singer, M., 1992. The Language of Heredity. California : Blackwell Scientific Publications.

3. Cooper, N., 1994. The Human Genome Project. California. University Science Books.

4. Crick, F., 1979. Split Genes and RNA Splicing. dim. Science, 204. 264-271.

5. Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology. 1987. New York: J.Woley & Sons.

6. Doolittle,W., 1978. Genes in Pieces:were they ever together? dim. Science. 272, 581-582.

7. Drlica, K., 1984. Understanding DNA and Gene Cloning. New York : John Wiley and Sons.

8. Felber, H., 1984. Terminology Manual. Vienna, Inforterm.

9. Geeraerts, D., l 989a. Wat er in een woord zit. Leuvens: Peeters.

10. Geeraerts, D., Prospects and Problems of Prototype Theory. dlm. Linguistics, 27-4(302), 587-661. ( 1989b.).

11. Geeraerts, D., 1993. Cognitive Semantics and the History of Philosophical Epistemology.
dlm. Geiger, R. I Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (eds.) Conceptualization and Mental Processing in Language. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

12. Gilbert, P., 1978. Why Genes in Pieces? Dlm. Nature, 271, 501.

13. Gilbert, P., 1991. Genome, Human. dim. Encyclopedia of Human Biology, Vol.3, 869-897.

14. Grinsted, J. I Bennet, P., 1988. Analysis of Plasmid DNA with Restriction Endonucleases. dlm. Grinsted, J. I Bennet, P. (eds.) Methods in Microbiology, Vol.21.

15. Halliday, M.A.K., 1985. An Intoduction to Function Grammar London: Edward Arnold.

16. Hawkes, N., 1991. Genetic Engineering. London : Franklin Watts.

17. Hodson, A., 1992. Essentials Genetics. London: Bloomsbury.

18. Johnson, M., 1987. The Body in Mind Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

19. Kleiber, G., 1987. La semantique du prototype. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

20. Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

21. Lakoff, G. / Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors We Live By Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22. Lauren, C. / Picht, H., 1993. (Hrsg.) Ausgewwdhlte Texte zur Terminologie. Wien: Termnet. IITF Infotem.

23. Lee,T., 1993. Gene Future: The Promise and Perils of New Biology. New York: Plenum Press.

24. Lewin, B., 1983. Genes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

25. Liebert, W.A. "Reflecting Your Own Cognitive Models: The Lexicons Of Metaphor-Models Of A Science Team Of AIDS-Research". Paper presented at the Third International Cognitive Linguistics Conference in Leuven. 18 to 23 Julai 1993.

26. Meyer, I. "Knowledge Management for Terminology-Intensive Applications: Needs and Tools". dim.: Pustejovsky, J. I Bergler, S. (eds.) Lexical semantics and Knowledge representation. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 21-37 1992.

27. Nicholl, D., 1994. An Introduction to Genetic Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28. Rieger, R. / Michaelis, A. I Green, M., 1991. Glossary of Genetics: Classical and Molecular. New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House.

29. Shapiro, R., 1991. The Human Blueprint: The Race to Unlock the Secrets of our Genetics Script. New York. St. Martin's Press.

30. Southern, E. Detection of Specific Sequences among DNA Fragments Separated by Gel Electrophoresis. dim. Journal of Molecular Biology, 98, 503-517, 1975.

31. Southern, E.,. Gel Electrophsresis. dim. Methods in Enzymology, 68, 152-176, 1979.

32. Starr, C., 1991. Biotechnology: Concepts and Applications. Belmont CA: Woodsworth inc.

33. Taylor, J., 1989. Linguistic categorization : Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Claredon Press.

34. Temmerman, R. Meaning Relationships and how to detect them: The case of Biotechnology.
dlm. Proceedings Maastricht Conference on Translation and Meaning. 1995.

35. Temmerman, R. The Process of Revitalization of Old Words; "Splicing", a case study in the extension ofreference. dlm. Terminology 2: l, 107-128.

36. Temmerman, R. ( 1996a). The Process of (neo)-Lexicalisation: the Case of Life Sciences. dlm. Proceedings Third International Terminology Meeting 19-20 April 1996. Centre de Terminologie de Bruxelles.

37. Temmerman, R., (l 996b ). "Retrospect Lexicalisation: A Recurrent Phenomenon in the Lexicalisation Process of the Life Sciences". dlm. Eur ex 96 Proceedings, 825-835.

38. Temmerman, R. Why some terms are more fit for standardization than others. From standardization to Optimisation of Understanding. dim. Steurs, F. (ed.) Terminology and Terminography in Relation to Translation. Amsterdam: Rodopi 1996c.

39. Temmerman, R., 1996d. Terminology: the Structuralist Tradition and The socio Cognitivist
Future. dlm. Terminology 3 (2).

40. Temmerman, R. I Simonis, F. / Luyten, L., 1990. Terminologie: een methode. Leuven: Acco.
The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology, 1988. W. Wilson.

41. The Oxford Dictionary of New Words. A Popular Guide to Words in the News, 1991
Oxford/New York : Oxford University Press.

42. Tournier, J., 1985. Introduction descriptive a la lexicogenetique de L'anglais contemporain. Paris-Geneve: Champion-Slatkine.

43. Watson, J., e.a. 1992. recombinant DNA 2nd. Ed., New York. W.H. Freeman & Co.

44. Wuster, E., 1991. Einfuhrung in die allgemeine Terminogielehre und terminologische Lexikographie. 3. Aufl Bonn. Romanistischer Verlag.

45. Zawada, B. I Swanepoel, P. On the Empirical Adequacy of Terminological Concept Theories. The case for Prototype Theory. dlm. Terminology (2) 253-275, 1994.
Telah diterbitkan
2022-12-28
Bagaimana untuk memetik sitasi
Temmerman, R. (2022). Persoalan keunggulan univositi: perbezaan antara terminologi sosiokognitif dengan terminologi tradisional. Jurnal Bahasa, 4(3), 573-605. Dicapai daripada https://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/jurnalbahasa/article/view/8620/4126