The Semantic and Syntactic Relation of Verbs of Possession: The Conceptual Structure Approach

(Hubungan Semantik dan Sintaksis Kata Kerja Gerak Bersifat Pemilikan: Satu Pendekatan Struktur Konseptual)

  • Maslida Yusof Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Nurul Jamilah Rosly Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Abstract

Verbs of possession refer to those concerning "belonging". This category of verb also means the transfer of a property (ownership) from one person to another. This article will focus on verbs of possession such as milik (possess), beri (give) and terima (accept) based on conceptual (abstract) point of view. This study utilizes data from the Corpus Data Base of Dewan Bahasa Pustaka as a sample. The analysis employs the Theory of Conceptual Structure of Ray Jackendoff (2005, 2007 & 2011). Semantic representations are described in the form of conceptual structures within Functions [Events] and [States] that carry the conceptual structure formula BE [x, y]. The findings show the representation of the conceptual structure of the verbs represented by the constituents of [BE possession], [GO possession] and [LET possession] in relation to the constituents [THING],[PATH] and [PLACE]. For conceptual structure representation to syntax, data findings indicate a relationship between the Head Rule and Argument Rule based on the role of the argument that becomes a subset of the request and acceptance of verbs to the Name Phrase. Consequently, this study demonstrates the conceptual structure of representation and its relations with systematic syntax, especially concerning verbs of possession.


Keywords: verb of possession, conceptual structure, constituents and argument

Author Biographies

Maslida Yusof, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Pusat Penyelidikan BITARA Melayu, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan
Nurul Jamilah Rosly, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Pusat Penyelidikan BITARA Melayu, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan

References

Ake Vibeg. (2010). Basics verb of possession. Journal De Liguistique Cognitive. V4, 119-127.

Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald dan R. M. W. Dixon. 2013. Possession and Ownership. Oxford University Press: United Kingdom.

Andes Sugaard. (2005). The semantic of possession in natural language and knowledge representation. Journal of Universal Language V1, 85-115.

Culicover, P.W & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford University Press: New York.

Gruber, J.S. (1965). Studies in Lexical Relations.Tesis Ph.D. Universiti Linguistik Club: Amsterdam.

Ray Jackendoff . 1983. Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press: London.

Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structure. MIT Press: London.

Jackendoff, R. (1992). Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation. MIT Press: London.

Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. MIT Press: London.

Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. MIT Press: London.

Jackendoff, R. (2005). The architecture of the language faculty. MIT Press: London.

Jackendoff, R. & Culicover, P.W. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford University Press: New York.

Jackendoff, R. (2007). Language of the mind: Essays on mental representation. MIT Press: London.

Jackendoff, R. (2011). Meaning and the lexicon: The parallel archicture 1975-2010 MIT Press: London

Kamus Dewan. (2010). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka: Kuala Lumpur.

Lakoff, G. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chocago Press.

Stassen, L. (2009). Predicative possession. Oxford University Press: New York.

Stolz, T. et al. (2008). Split possession. John Benjamin: Amsterdam.
Published
2018-06-01
How to Cite
YUSOF, Maslida; ROSLY, Nurul Jamilah. The Semantic and Syntactic Relation of Verbs of Possession: The Conceptual Structure Approach. Jurnal Bahasa, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 1, p. 46-64, june 2018. ISSN 2462-1889. Available at: <http://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/jurnalbahasa/article/view/2506>. Date accessed: 03 dec. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.37052/jb18(1)no3.