Hipotesis pergerakan dan enklitik -nya: implikasi terhadap teori kasus dan teoriteta
Abstract
This article discusses in detail the application of Movement Hypothesis which had explained the cliticization of enclitic "-nya" (Jurnal Bahasa, June 2006) in Malay language. The analysis can be strengthened the case and theta theory which had implication due to the movement hypothesis can be explained in detail. The implication towards the case and theta theory was discussed b; Aoun (1982), Kayne (1975) and Jaegg!i (1982). These three experts had a different view towards the theta mark and case assignment. They named the theta marking and case assignment to the certain clitics as theta absorption and case absorption. Therefore, this writing will concentrate on the theta mark at the D-structure and case assignment at the L-structure and explain the theta and case absorption by the enclitic "-nya" in Malay language.
References
2. Aoun, J., 1985. A Grammar of Anaphora. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
3. Borer, H., 1984. Parametric Syntax: Cease SLudies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
4. Chomsky, N., 1982a. Lectures on Government and Binding-the P/SA Lecture. Dordrecht-Holland: Foris Publication.
5. Chomsky, N., 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Chomsky, N ., 1986b. Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
7. Fazal Mohamed bin Mohamed Sultan, 2006. "Pengklitikan Enklitik ยท-nya' pada Kata Kerja: Aplikasi Teori Kuasaan dan Tambatan (chomsky, 1986)" dlm. Jurnal Bahasa. 6:3. hlm. 363-384.
8. Gruber. J.S. 1965. "Studies in Lexical Relations". Disertasi Ph .D. MIT., Cambridge.
9. Haegeman, L., 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory Edisi ke-2. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Jackendoff R.S. , 1975. "Morphological and Semantic Regularities in The Lexicon" dlm. Language 51. hlm. 639- 71.
11. Jaeggli, 0., 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
12. Kamus Linguistik, 1997. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
13. Kayne, R. S., 1975. French Syntax: The Transformational Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
14. Ouhalla, J., 1999. lntroducting Transformational Grammar: from Principle and Parameters to Minimalism. Edisi ke-2 . London: Oxford University Press.
15. Ramli Md. Salleh, 1989. Fronted Constituents in Malay: Bases Structures and Move Alpha in a Configurational Non-Indo-European Language. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
16. Rouveret A. & Yergnaud J.R., 1980. "Specifying Reference to the Subject" dlm. Linguistic Inquiry II hlm. 97-202.
17. Stowell, T., 1981. "Origins of Phrase Structure". Disertasi Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
18. Suner, M., 1988. "The Role of Agreement in Clitic-doubled Construction " dlm. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, hlm. 391 - 434.
19. Weisler, S. E. & Milekic, S., 2000. Theory of Language. Mass: The MIT Press.
20. Williams, E., 1995. "Theta Theory" dlm. Webelhuth Gert (peny.) Government and Binding Theory, hlm 99- 123. USA: Basil Blackwell Limited.
21. Zwicky, A. M., 1977. On Clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Upon acceptance of an article, Authors will be asked to transfer copyright. This transfer will ensure the widest possible dissemination of information. A notification will be sent to the corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript. If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the Author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
