Tetenunan dalam puisi

  • Arbak Othman Universiti Putra Malaysia

Abstract

This article tries to elaborate and prove that a meaningful poem must be in the form of a strong poetic discourse. The strength of a poetic discourse is viewed from the application of the theory of linguistic formation and analysis that is adapted to the poem. The application of the discourse theory is viewed from the satisfaction of such criteria as the continuence, exclusion and replacement of elements in the text that cohesively comprise the meaning or unified and tied meaning and maintaining the coherence in the unified form in the poem. A cohesion is a strategy that proves the coherence that forms what is known as the "message" in the poem. In addition, the formation of message is also viewed from the formation of meaning that unites the diction based on the collocational measurement. Evidently the poem by A. Aziz Deraman are composed as a strong discourse based on that measurement. The strength of a poetic discourse is also viewed from the role of several textual connectors in a meaningful text. All of them are looked into in order to prove the formation of strong messages hidden in the diction and relates their formation by using the relationship between new and old informations tied in the poem, that their unified messages are attained coherently through the semiotic interpretation of the text, that are present in Kau dan Aku, a collection of poem by A. Aziz Deraman.

References

1. A.Aziz Deraman, 1994. Kau danAku, antologi puisi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

2. Asmah Haji Omar, 1980. "Analisis Wacana" (bahagian Pertama) dlm. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, 24(4): 11-25. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

2. Asmah Haji Omar, 1980. "Analisis Wacana" (bahagian Kedua) dlm. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, 24(4): 9-25. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

3. Azhar M. Simin, 1993. Sintaksis - Wacana "Yang" Dalam Bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

4. Beaugrande, R. de, dan Dressler, 1981. Introduction To Text Linguistics, London: Longman.

5. Blonsky, Marshall, 1979. "The Text Drive" dlm. Semiotics Unfolding, Vol. II. Amsterdam: Mouton.

6. Gutwinski, Waideman, 1972. Cohesion in Literary Text: A Study of Some Grammatical and Lexical Features of English Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.

7. Halliday, M.A.K. dan Hassan, R., 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

8. Harimurti Kridalaksana, 1978. "Keutuhan Wacana" dlm. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

9. Harris, Zellig, 1952, "Discourse Analysis" dim. Language, 28-1-30.

10. Lutfi Ahas, 1979, "Analisis Wacana Sebuah Cerpen" dlm. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, 23(12): 63-73. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

11. Lutfi Abas, 1982, "Keindahan Sastera Melalui Analisis Wacana" dlm. Farid M. Onn (ed), Stilistik: Simposium Keindahan Bahasa. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

12. Sato Hirobumi @ Rahmat Abdullah, 1997. Anal is is Nahu Wacana Bahasa Melayu Klasik Berdasarkan Teks Hikayat Hang Tuah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

13. Stubbs. M. 1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

14. Tarigan Henry Guntur, 1995. Pengajaran Wacana. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

15. Wong Khek Seng, 1993. "Pautan dan Pembinaan Teks dalam Bahasa Melayu: Satu Tinjauan Awal", dlm. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, 37(4): 306-314. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

16. Werth, P. 1984. Coherence and Emphasis. London: Croom Helm.
Published
2001-09-03
How to Cite
OTHMAN, Arbak. Tetenunan dalam puisi. Jurnal Bahasa, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 3, p. 315-338, sep. 2001. ISSN 2462-1889. Available at: <http://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/jurnalbahasa/article/view/8674>. Date accessed: 10 mar. 2026.